the-south-asian.com AUGUST 2001 | ||
about us contact us data bank past issues the craft shop the print gallery | ||
SOCIETY & CULTURE Traditional
societies - Wisdom and Challenges SOUTH ASIAN FEATURE Hands
Across Borders INTERVIEW
Shantiniketan
and origin of Modern Art
Reinventing
India
Royal
Bengal's last roar?
|
Page 2
of 4
By Vijay Kowshik From L to R: Abanindranath Tagore,
Nandlal Bose Nandalal Bose who had studied under Abanindranath
Tagore,
founder of the Bengal School of Art, first headed the Art School, or 'Kala
Bhavan', as it is known. [Abanindranath was the son of Rabindranath's older
brother]. Abanindranath was instrumental in the start of the
contemporary art movement in India. The political environment in India, in
the early decades of the twentieth century, was charged with a nationalist
spirit. The question of the time was whether to revive old art forms of the
glorious past or to adopt the western techniques with the sparkle of the
modern European mind, and the spectacular achievements of the west.
Abanindranath was the one person who could overcome this dilemma and firmly
develop his personal style. He confidently discarded the revivalist ideal
but absorbed the implications of the Indian art traditions. In his personal
style he easily assimilated the techniques acquired from his British and
Italian teachers and he also set up an art school. One of his most gifted
pupils was Nandalal Bose (1882 - 1966). Rabindranath asked Nandalal Bose to build and head the art
department at Shantiniketan in 1921. Nandalal believed in exploring the
uniqueness of the Indian genius as revealed in the long tradition of Indian
art. It was his firm conviction that an Indian artist must learn an
authentic language, which is in harmony, and is compatible with his spirit,
in order to respond to the emerging new era of art. The tension and warmth
that saturated his works were a reflection of a conscious, creative
personality engaged in the rigorous endeavor to evolve and project an image
of Indian modernity. In a write-up on Nandalal, Rabindranath observed: "Nandalal, I know, could not submit to … paralyzing effect of a
personal manner in his progress to self-expression through art. I have long
noticed a trait of self-rebellion in him. The creative power everywhere has
need of this self revolt… Nandalal was urged by this continual
restlessness of vitality in his creative work … His brush is ever directed
to a journey beyond his own past achievement. That is truly the way to
universality of creation, and endless is the road that lies ahead." Nandalal’s mental makeup was in complete resonance with
Rabindranath’s attitude. Nandalal never adhered to any particular
technique or medium and continually vented his creative urge in diverse
forms. Nor did he influence upon any of his students or interfere with their
personal development. He also believed that an artist could not be created.
A teacher of art could only assist a student-artist’s self-development.
This freedom and an absence of academic rigidity certainly contributed to
the emergence of talent with distinct individuality.
Copyright © 2000 - 2001 [the-south-asian.com]. Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. |